<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising Offer That I Hate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate</link>
	<description>make money, wordpress themes, blogging basics and tips and more</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NEW Batch Of 3 UNIQUE WordPress Themes &#124; How To Earn Money Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate/comment-page-1#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>NEW Batch Of 3 UNIQUE WordPress Themes &#124; How To Earn Money Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogging-secret.com/?p=119#comment-776</guid>
		<description>[...] Advertising Offer That I Hate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advertising Offer That I Hate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate/comment-page-1#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogging-secret.com/?p=119#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Yes, I don't care if I accept this cheap advertising offer for those my "lousy" blog, but Blogging Secret will not going to accept the cheap advertising like this. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I don&#8217;t care if I accept this cheap advertising offer for those my &#8220;lousy&#8221; blog, but Blogging Secret will not going to accept the cheap advertising like this. <img src='http://www.blogging-secret.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate/comment-page-1#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Malin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogging-secret.com/?p=119#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I've got plenty of emails like that. And I actually took the offer for one of my websites. It didn't have very much traffic to it and I haven't had a plan to make it successful. So for an inactive site, I thought 70 bucks was quite nice.
But I would never accept it on any of my more popular sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got plenty of emails like that. And I actually took the offer for one of my websites. It didn&#8217;t have very much traffic to it and I haven&#8217;t had a plan to make it successful. So for an inactive site, I thought 70 bucks was quite nice.<br />
But I would never accept it on any of my more popular sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl W.T. Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.blogging-secret.com/advertising-offer-that-i-hate/comment-page-1#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl W.T. Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogging-secret.com/?p=119#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Yea bro.. many of these people around buying old blog post in-text links. The one you mention here is somewhat different and more intrusive which I would not even consider. In-text link on ancient posts is still ok to a certain extent as long as the keyword they want is short and sweet... and at the right price too of course... LOL!

Great post dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea bro.. many of these people around buying old blog post in-text links. The one you mention here is somewhat different and more intrusive which I would not even consider. In-text link on ancient posts is still ok to a certain extent as long as the keyword they want is short and sweet&#8230; and at the right price too of course&#8230; LOL!</p>
<p>Great post dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
